|
Tidbits
News you may have missed...
web
posted May 21, 2001
High court strikes down medical use for marijuana
The Supreme Court handed medical marijuana users a major defeat on May
14, ruling that a federal law classifying the drug as illegal has no exception
for ill patients.
The 8-0 decision was a major disappointment to many sufferers of AIDS,
cancer, multiple sclerosis and other illnesses. They have said the drug
helped enormously in combating the devastating effects of their diseases.
Justice Stephen Breyer did not participate because his brother, a federal
judge, initially presided over the case.
"In the case of the Controlled Substances Act, the statute reflects
a determination that marijuana has no medical benefits worthy of an exception
(outside the confines of a government-approved research project),"
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the unanimous court.
Thomas noted the act states marijuana has "no currently accepted
medical use."
The federal government triggered the case in 1998, seeking an injunction
against the Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperative and five other marijuana
distributors.
U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, brother of the justice, sided with
the government. All the clubs except the Oakland group eventually closed
down, and the Oakland club turned to registering potential marijuana recipients
while it awaited a final ruling.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court, ruling
that medical necessity is a legal defense. Charles Breyer followed up
by issuing strict guidelines for making that claim.
Voters in Arizona, Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Nevada, Oregon
and Washington also have approved ballot initiatives allowing the use
of medical marijuana. In Hawaii, the legislature passed a similar law
and the governor signed it last year.
The cooperative argued that a drug may not yet have achieved general
acceptance as a medical treatment, but may still have medical benefits
to a particular patient or class of patients.
Thomas said the argument cannot overcome the intent of Congress in approving
the statute.
"It is clear from the text of the act that Congress has made a determination
that marijuana has no medical benefits worthy of an exception," Thomas
wrote.
"Unwilling to view this omission as an accident, and unable in any
event to override a legislative determination manifest in a statute, we
reject the cooperative's argument."
Advocates of medical marijuana say the drug can ease side effects from
chemotherapy, save nauseated AIDS patients from wasting away or even allow
multiple sclerosis sufferers to rise from a wheelchair and walk.
There is no definitive science that the drug works, or works better than
conventional, legal alternatives.
Several states are considering medical marijuana laws, and Congress may
revisit the issue this year. A measure to counteract laws like California's
died in the House last year.
Thomas was joined by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Sandra Day O'Connor,
Antonin Scalia and Anthony M. Kennedy. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote
a concurring opinion, joined by Justices David Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
The case is United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperative, 00-151.
Eco-terrorists linked to foot-mouth outbreak
Eco-terrorists may be behind the rash of foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks
across the globe, two prominent agriculture leaders warned May 14.
The
heads of both the U.S. and British farming groups said opponents to intensive
forms of agriculture could not be ruled out as the source of disease outbreaks.
Ben Gill, president of the United Kingdom's National Farmers' Union,
in Canberra for a farmers' conference, said Australia should maintain
its tough quarantine measures because of the threat of eco-terrorists.
"There's no doubt foot-and-mouth spread to the U.K. illegally and,
unfortunately, we cannot rule out eco-terrorism," he said.
"The last thing you would want to do is ease your quarantine rules
in Australia. If you can find a way to further tighten them, then do it."
The head of the U.S. Farm Bureau, Bob Stallman, confirmed his organization
had begun talks with the Federal Bureau of Investigation into possible
eco-terrorist activity.
Stallman said there were activists encouraging the introduction of foot-and-mouth
into the United States to protest against intensive agriculture.
A rash of foot-and-mouth outbreaks have been recorded across the globe
over the past three years, most linked to the Asian strain of the disease.
Gill said Australia would have to contend with increasingly militant
green splinter groups which would stop at nothing to undermine existing
agricultural practices.
"The pressures of the green groups are intense in Europe, and what
I understand, building here in Australia," he said.
Australia immediately increased its quarantine restrictions when the
foot-and-mouth outbreak erupted in Britain in February.
Tougher inspections at ports and airports, and bans on meat, livestock
and used agricultural equipment were introduced.
Gill said he would campaign to have Australia's quarantine laws put in
place in Europe.
"I have to say I wish we had your standards in Europe," he
told reporters.
Millions of animals have been slaughtered in Britain in an attempt to
stop the spread of foot-and-mouth disease.
World's poorest nations demand more
While admitting past failures of their own, leaders from the world's
poorest countries demanded more aid on May 14 to rescue them from a downward
economic spiral.
At the start of a U.N. conference on poverty, leaders of the world's
49 least developed countries sought help from those from richer countries,
who pledged to change the way they deliver assistance as a result of years
of ineffective development aid programs.
"Few would doubt the general impression that our gathering in Brussels
for a third ... conference is an admission of failure," said Nigerian
President Olusegun Obasanjo.
He called for "urgent concrete action" by rich countries to
implement previous promises to improve trade and market access to the
poorest countries.
Obasanjo and other speakers also called for a commitment to full debt
cancellation and a stepped up fight against HIV infection and AIDS.
"We need more resources and resources that can be made available
immediately," said Alpha Oumar Konare, President of Mali.
In a declaration, the 49 nations called on rich countries like the United
States, Japan and the 15-nation European Union to reverse the "declining
trend" in development aid and to provide special status for poorer
countries within the World Trade Organization.
But as many participants were quick to blame richer nations for not doing
enough, they also said more had to be done by themselves.
"We must own up to our weaknesses before we blame others,"
said Apollo Nsibambi, Prime Minister of Uganda.
Despite decades of global growth and development aid, the number of countries
the United Nations calls "least developed" -- those with per
capita income of less than $900 a year and scarce investment in health,
nutrition and education -- has nearly doubled since 1971, from 25 to 49.
The United Nations has said aid to these nations has dropped by 45 percent
since 1990.
More than half of the 630 million people in those countries -- mostly
in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia but also Haiti and some Pacific
island nations -- live on less than a dollar a day.
"Clearly, this conference has to be different from the previous
ones," said U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan.
Two previous conferences -- in 1981 and 1990 -- ended with wealthier
nations pledging to devote 0.7 percent of gross national product to development
aid. Yet most have reduced their foreign aid budgets over the past decade.
Annan noted that the conference seeks to produce agreement this time
not only on aid targets, but also a "built-in monitoring system"
for achieving them.
Other participants, like French President Jacques Chirac, called on all
participants to take steps to improve their commitment to helping the
poorest. "The unconscionable situation with which the world gets
ever richer and the poor remain poor can and must be ended."
It was made clear however, that new aid would come at the condition that
poorer countries move to implement not only economic reforms, but political
ones too, including improvement of human rights, democracy and the fight
against corruption.
Andrew Natsios, head of the United States Agency for International Development,
said the lack of strong democratic institutions and systems to make sure
money is spent properly is the biggest reason for failure.
"It's not a lack of money," he said. "There has to be
local political will."
Hillary Clinton bogged down by Whitewater bills
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., is still weighed down by costly
legal bills dating back to the Whitewater investigation. However, she
also has substantial holdings in a blind trust, according to financial
disclosure reports filed with the Senate.
The disclosure is Clinton's first as a lawmaker. It covers the year 2000
and does not include any income from her $8 million book deal with Simon
& Schuster, which was negotiated last year but only signed in January.
Clinton reported a government-approved blind trust worth between $500,001
and $1 million. That joint trust with husband Bill dates from the Clintons'
White House days and was approved by the executive branch's Office of
Government Ethics. It earned between $100,001 and $1 million in 2000.
Clinton's outstanding legal fees total between $2.3 million and $10.6
million, the report said. They are owed to five law firms, two in Little
Rock Ark. and three in Washington D.C.
The Clintons ran up hefty legal bills during their eight years in the
White House because of Whitewater and other investigations. They have
a separate legal expense fund to help defray those costs.
Members of Congress must file disclosure forms annually that outline
in the broadest terms their personal fortunes, investments and income
beyond their congressional salary of $134,113.
Clinton reported overall assets of between $682,000 and $1.5 million.
She listed stock for daughter Chelsea in AT&T, Verizon, BellSouth
and Lucent Technologies.
New York's junior senator received $8,534 in royalties from her book
"It Takes a Village," which was donated to charity, the form
said.
Neither Clinton or Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.,reported accepting any
gifts, travel or honoraria.
Clinton came under fire for $190,027 in furniture, china and other gifts
she and the president took with them from the White House. But none of
those had to be reported on her Senate disclosure form because she was
not yet a senator, aides said.
Schumer and his wife Iris listed assets worth between $274,014 and $985,000
million. The only liability they reported was a mortgage worth between
$15,001 and $50,000 on their home in Brooklyn.
Clinton egged on trip to Poland
Former President Clinton was jeered by anti-globalization protesters
and hit by an egg on May 17 while visiting Poland's capital as part of
a European speaking tour.
The
egg struck Clinton's sleeve as he walked through Warsaw's Old Town district.
Police detained a 19-year-old man.
"The president laughed at the matter, saying, 'It's good for young
people to be angry about something,"' spokeswoman Jennifer Palmeri
said. He was not injured.
The incident came one day after Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott was
targeted by an egg-throwing heckler in Wales. The British politician's
response, however, was less mild. He punched the man in the face.
About 150 young Poles protested outside the hotel where Clinton was giving
an address on globalization to business people. Some of the demonstrators
held banners reading "Globalization kills our planet" and "Yes
to people, no to profit."
FBI chief acknowledges 'cultural defect'
Director Louis Freeh on May 17 said a "cultural defect" contributed
to his agency's failure to promptly hand over documents whose late discovery
has delayed the execution of convicted Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh.
A top Senate Democrat said some "heads ought to roll" for the
blunder.
Answering
questions from lawmakers for a second day on Capitol Hill, Freeh at first
repeated his belief that simple human error was to blame for the papers
not coming to light in time to be considered during trials for McVeigh
and his convicted accomplice, Terry Nichols.
But Sen. Ernest "Fritz" Hollings, D-South Carolina, the ranking
Democrat on a Senate appropriations subcommittee holding the hearing,
insisted that Freeh address what he called a long-standing "cultural
problem" at the FBI.
Freeh acknowledged that instructions went out 11 times to FBI personnel
to compile and forward all papers related to the case. "I think there
is a cultural problem here in not taking seriously the very clear and
explicit commands that were given in a very important case," he said.
He said additional management training is being instituted to ensure
better handling of records.
"That's a cultural defect which I will attempt to address by the
stand-down that we're going to do," he added.
Freeh, 51, who plans to retire from the FBI next month, also told lawmakers
he plans to recruit and hire someone for a high-level position to oversee
documents management and try to prevent such errors in the future.
Hollings was not appeased. "Don't hire anybody. Fire some people,"
he said. "Make them accountable. They'll know. They'll understand.
And until you do that, they'll play the game."
His voice rising, Hollings continued. "Get rid of some -- some heads
ought to roll where they didn't respond to these communications appropriately,"
he said.
We at ESR have been praying for this. Reno may run for Florida governorship
Former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno said on May 18 she was considering
running for governor of Florida in 2002.
Though Republican incumbent Jeb Bush has not declared his intentions,
many observers expect the president's brother to seek a second term.
Reno, 62, a Democrat, was born in Miami and served as Dade County state's
attorney for 10 years before moving to Washington.
Though initially reluctant to consider a return to public life, Reno
told CNN in a telephone interview, "I decided I should give it consideration
because I love this state so much."
Asked about when she might make a final decision, she said, "When
I've properly and thoroughly considered it."
Reno, who since leaving office has been relaxing and enjoying such outdoors
pursuits as kayaking, suffers from Parkinson's Disease, a neurological
disorder that causes involuntary tremor. She disclosed her possible interest
in a run for the state house in Tallahassee in an interview with Miami
TV station WPLG.
Asked whether her medical condition could hinder her ability to serve
as governor, she said, "I survived for almost eight years in Washington,
under a very rigorous schedule ... I'm prepared to go forward."
Reno would not comment on the FBI's bungling of investigative documents
and tapes it should have turned over to the defense in the case of Oklahoma
City bomber Timothy McVeigh case, whose scheduled execution has been delayed
until June 11.
"I've not been briefed on it, I was not aware of it, so I cannot
comment," she said. "I would not comment while the matter is
pending."
On the potential impact on a Reno candidacy of Elian Gonzalez, the Cuban
boy who was rescued off the Florida coast on Thanksgiving Day in 1999
only to be seized by U.S. authorities many months later so he could be
returned to Cuba, she said:
"I'm sure it will be one of the issues."
Reno said she might mull over her decision on a planned trip out West.
"I've got my truck, I got the top for the truck the other day,"
she said.
"What I want to do is make a determination about what's best for
Florida," she said.
Poll pinpoints campaign turnaround
One of the most significant shifts in public opinion in the 2000 presidential
campaign came in late September when perceptions of Democrat Al Gore's honesty
dropped sharply and only gradually recovered, a detailed tracking poll suggests.
The presidential debates in October were some of the highest profile
events in the race between Gore and eventual election winner George W.
Bush, but may not have been the most important.
One of the most significant shifts in the campaign likely started before
the first debate, according to researchers for the Annenberg 2000 Election
Survey. The survey was discussed May 19 at the annual meeting of the American
Association for Public Opinion Research in Montreal.
That slip in Gore's support and in perceptions of his honesty started
soon after a series of misstatements on everything from the cost of medicines
for his mother-in-law and his dog to the origin of a union song Gore claimed
to have heard as a child, but was actually written after he was grown.
The stories were intended to make a political point, but when they turned
out not to be literally true, Republicans seized on them as evidence of
Gore's lack of trustworthiness.
The pollsters note they cannot definitively point to which events caused
the drop in perceptions of Gore's honesty. But they cite a dramatic shift
in late September, soon after the statements and other questions about
Gore's trustworthiness became a hot topic on the campaign trail.
The study, headed by Kathleen Hall Jamieson, dean of the Annenberg School
of Communication, and Richard Johnston, a Canadian political scientist,
suggested the sharp drop for Gore in late September, especially on his
personal traits, was "the hinge of the campaign."
"We were stunned by the speed of this decline," said Michael
Hagen, a senior researcher for the project.
The Democratic nominee said at the time that the significance of the
misstatements was being exaggerated. His wife, Tipper, said the comments
were made in the heat of the campaign and should not be put under a microscope.
Gore already was recovering from the drop by the first debate and did
not lose significant ground after that debate, the poll suggested. Gore
did slip a bit after the second debate, but gained ground after the last
presidential debate when perception of Bush's knowledge of the issues
dropped.
Gore gained ground on Bush steadily after the last debate, and eventually
won the popular vote, but lost the electoral vote.
The tracking poll with 100,000 interviews of more than 80,000 Americans
was conducted between November 1999 and January 2001. It was one of the
largest political surveys ever conducted.
Research on the data is continuing and should provide much more information
on the effects of advertising, campaign appearances and other campaign
events.
The poll tracked the boost both candidates experienced around their parties'
conventions. It also looked at the public's learning curve on candidate
positions on issues such as investing Social Security funds in the stock
market.
The poll showed that the public was unaware of the candidates' differences
on that issue favored by Bush as late as the start of October.
But people became more aware through the debates of Gore's opposition
to investing Social Security funds, and he was able to bring many Democrats
and some independents to his side on the issue.
1 | 2
| 3 | 4
| 5
|