From sci-fi to sci-fact: Panel releases new embryonic stem cell research guidelines
By Sharon Hughes
As reported in the San Francisco Chronicle on April 27, 2005, a 20-member panel picked by the National Academies, a Congress commissioned independent organization, released their 131-page report with guidelines for human embryonic stem cell research "offering a system of institutional self-policing as a way to move the politically contentious research forward." These guidelines, while applying to all stem cell research, would be voluntary.
The guidelines include:
The panel also addressed two aspects of cloning recommending that cloning for reproductive purposes is unethical and should not be done, however, a cloning technique used to create embryos for therapeutic purposes, called nuclear transfer, could be used which "may be needed to cultivate a patient's own stem cells".
The new guidelines are "critical" to California being able to spend the $3 billion Prop 71 authorized the state to spend on stem cell and cloning research last year. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and others re-introduced a bill in the Senate last week that contains similar provisions as the new guidelines. However, Republicans do not favor the bill or "destroying young human lives for the benefit of others," as represented by Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS).
Please take note that these are voluntary guidelines using the word 'should' versus 'must' or 'must not', including that human embryos "used for research should not be grown in culture for more than 14 days." In other words, 'should' be destroyed.
I want to encourage everyone to do some research on how the eugenics movement began in Germany, as well as here in the United States before WWII...with the doctors. Edwin Black, the five-time Pulitzer Prize nominee, has done extensive research on this subject in his books, War on the Weak, IBM and the Holocaust, and others. His commentaries can also be found on our web site at www.changingworldviews.com.
If we continue to devalue human life and allow it's destruction in the name of research or for any other reason, then it will only be a matter of time until we see more cases such as Terri Schiavo's, the acceptance of doctor-assisted suicide, and the killing of defective babies after they are born, up to three months old, as advocated by Peter Singer of Princeton University.
Where will we draw the line on what we will and will not do to humans? Will we stand by and watch this kind of sci-fi become sci-fact? It's our choice. We each have a voice. Will we use it, is the question.
Get weekly updates about new issues of ESR!
This week's poll
© 1996-2013, Enter Stage Right and/or its creators. All rights reserved.