|
The con of confidentiality
By Joyce Mucci
web
posted August 2, 1999
The confidentiality regulation that federally funded family planning
clinics enjoy in the United States may cost young adolescent females their
reproductive life.
A study published in the Journal of Pediatrics in March 1999 reveal that
in the course of one year over 10,296 pap smears were done on a predominately
all white population from rural and suburban Maine, New Hampshire and
Vermont. The Department of Pathology, University of Vermont, conducted
the study and Flecher Allen Health Care in Burlington, Vermont. Flecher
Allen Laboratories is under contract with Planned Parenthood to do routine
lab work.
Seventy-three percent of the population studied were Pap smears that
came from Planned Parenthood. Alarmingly, the clients ranged in age from
a mere 10 years old to 19 years. The Pap smear were "diagnoses to
determine the prevalence rates of cytomorphologic identifiable entities
of both an infectious and precancerous nature in pediatric and adolescent
girls." Essentially, the pathologist was looking for conditions that
are a precursor to HPV (Human Papilloma Virus). The researchers noted
that, "The causal relationship of the sexually transmitted human
papilloma virus (HPV) and squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) with
carcinoma of the cervix has been well described." According to the
researchers this is the "largest series evaluating Pap smear diagnoses
in this age group in the past decade in the United States."
Among this population diagnosed were 378 cases in the 10 to 14-year-old
group, of which there were varying degrees of SIL's ranging from low grade
to high grade to undetermined. These diagnoses excluded HPV however; patients
who have been diagnosed with HPV have SIL's which leads to life threatening
cervical cancer according to the study.
Additionally, these girls also were diagnosed with infections ranging
from fungus to herpes. "The 14.6% rate of infectious processes, excluding
HPV, was the highest in the 10 to 19-year-old age cluster and when studied
in 5-year groupings, showed the highest percentage in 10 to 14-year-old
girls (16.7%)" The researches commented that the infections "although
not life threatening, many of these microbiologic entities necessitate
medical intervention."
From a clinical perspective it is a distressing trend to most health
care workers and researchers that they are confronted with sexually transmitted
diseases in females so young. This has lead the American Academy of Pediatrics
to make "recommendations that pelvic examination and routine Pap
smear should be offered as part of preventative health maintenance to
patients between 18 and 21-years-of-age." However, there is a distinct
difference between and 18-year-old and a 10-year-old.
When Planned Parenthood was contacted regarding these girls they declined
to furnish any statistical information. They acknowledged that because
of the confidentiality requirement they could not release that information.
However, under the plain reading of the Title X Family Planning regulation
42 CFR 59.11 "All information as to personal facts and circumstances
obtained by the project staff about individuals receiving services must
be held confidential and must not be disclosed without the individual's
consent, except as may be necessary to provide services to the patient
or as required by law, with appropriate safeguards for confidentiality.
Otherwise, information may be disclosed only in summary, statistical,
or other form which does not identify particular individuals."
The Alan Guttmacher Institute, who receives grant money from The Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS), regularly issues statistical information
provided by Planned Parenthood. Information that includes race, income,
contraceptive choices, how many times a week a particular population has
sex, whether they used a condom and why they sought out reproductive services
in the first place. Instead Planned Parenthood directed all inquiries
about the population in this study be made to the Vermont Department of
Social and Rehabilitative Services who could make available statewide
statistics -which of course were not useful about this particular group
of girls. The Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Population
Affairs spokeswoman Evelyn Kappler indicated that they would be required
to look in the legal aspects of the request.
However, there is a larger and infinitely more important issue at hand
than mere statistics. When the Pap smears came back to Planned Parenthood
for the 10 to 14-year-old group how did the clinic workers explain the
results to their young clients? Were parents notified of their children's
abnormal test results?
Planned Parenthood, as a rule, does not notify parents, because under
Title X regulation the confidentiality of the client is paramount. Unless
the youngster requests that a parent is brought into the loop she alone
must bear the news that her Pap smear is abnormal and potentially dangerous
to her future health and fertility. The Pap smear results, according to
Planned Parenthood in Burlington, were reported to the clients by telephone,
and counseling about the results was also completed by telephone. An unappealing,
cold and distant way to deliver bad news to a child. Considering the mental
acumen of most 10 to 14-year-olds it is highly unlikely that they would
understand the gravity of the news.
This makes a compelling case for parental notification.
The federal regulation excluding parents or legal guardians from the
health care decision making process of minors is based on the flimsy excuse
that it would have a chilling effect on a minor seeking reproductive services.
Simply because a child resists the intrusion of a parent because of fear
or shame is to elevate their reasoning capabilities to that of an adult
which flies in the face of common sense. The familial covenant that exists
between parent and child should not be usurped because of the statist
notion that we know what is best for your children. And the equally bizarre
reasoning accepted by federally subsidized family planning providers that
10-year-olds know what is best for them.
The 378 ten to fourteen-year-olds who sought medical services at Planned
Parenthood would have been better served if they had been initially evaluated,
and the results of an abnormal Pap smear, were discussed in the presence
of a parent. Who, by the way, is the only individual who can fully support
that child's emotional, physical and spiritual well being. Instead, these
youngsters were mere entities on the other end of a telephone line. 
Joyce Mucci has been published in the Kansas City Star, MetroVoice
and in e-zines such as The New Australian, EtherZone and Rightgrrl where
she is an Advisory Board Member.
|