A new world order guide
By Ben Cerruti
web posted November 29, 2010
Suppose that there might exist on our planet elements that wanted to establish a single world government. Such a single centralized entity would obviously require individual countries to relinquish their individual sovereignties. Americans would have to accept a world constitution whose provisions would supercede those existing in the constitution on which the country was founded. The provisions of the world constitution would make the freedoms provided in the Bill of Rights mute.
What better way to condition people to accept diminution of their freedoms than to create a potential world calamity that gives license for government to impose freedom limiting regulations. Such has been done by the United Nations's Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC). Its 2001 report stated "human activities have altered the Earth system" and predicted potential catastrophic changes on our planet in years to come. The very fact that it was found necessary to study 'climate change' by the United Nations and attendant funding was provided for the necessary research should make one suspect. It smells to high heaven of an international conspiracy to create dominance of the activities of the world's people by a single governing power.
Thankfully the IPCC report was found to have scientific data that was rigged. See http://assassinationscience.com/climategate/ , Many have already profited from this fraud such as scientists receiving research grants, former VP Al Gore, George Soros a proponent of a new world order and others who promote world socialism. Unfortunately, there are also those in our present and past administrations who seem immune to the fact that the IPCC report is fraudulent. It could be assumed that the use of 'climate change' as a reason to impose rule and regulations that take away individual freedoms provides them with more power to control the people.
Another example is the utilization of a potential calamity resulting from airline explosions caused by terrorists carrying explosives on their bodies. An excuse is thus provided to intrude on the privacy of individuals and to violate the provisions the fourth amendment to our constitution. In order to fly, people accepting body scans and intrusive pat downs add this to the other erosions to our freedoms on the road to an eventual new world order. Rather than addressing the identification of the true perpetrators, the potential bomb carrying terrorists, they are looking for the bomb.
It is again the government reacting to the 'effect' instead of the 'cause'. Isn't it obvious that the enemy is winning when our freedoms and way of life are diminished. The terrorists do not have to set off any bombs they only have to provide the threat to succeed. The same goes for the 'new world order' promoters. The 'climate change-global warming' threat provided the excuse for government to impose regulations that control the fuel we use, the auto's we drive, the food we eat, where we set our thermostat ad infinitum.
The fact is that there are members of both our major political parties who have been either active or silent collaborators in the diminution of our individual freedoms. Even with the good intentions of those grass root elements such as the Tea Party it will be difficult to stop the trend towards a 'new world order'. Unless a political movement takes hold to enforce the State's Rights provisions of the Constitution's tenth amendment it would appear impossible to stop. This movement would have to provide for a repeal of the sixteenth amendment and bring back the 'power of the purse' to the States.
At 85 years of age I do not expect this to happen in my lifetime. However, I believe it could happen at some point in this century and that I will be able to view it from my flat screen TV in the sky. 
Now a senior citizen, Ben Cerruti has been involved in espousing his views in writing for the last 20 plus years. He has been published numerous times in various San Francisco bay area newspapers and has been actively involved in taking positions on ballot measures to the point of writing the arguments and rebuttals and appearing on television to state his position. He has been involved in ongoing extensive correspondence with Milton Friedman, noted nobel laureate in economics, and is presently preparing to present this series on his websitehttp://www.arationaladvocate.com.