home > archive > 2014 > this article

The Divinely Human Prison: Chapter Three: Kissinger and Gruber

By Michael Moriarty
web posted December 22, 2014

From Jim Kouri's article for the Examiner: "While the Republicans are getting ready to take control of the U.S. Senate in just a few weeks, Americans witnessed a preview on Saturday of what can be expected in 2015 from a GOP majority in both houses of the U.S. Congress.

"When Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, raised a point of order saying that President Barack Obama's immigration reform by fiat is unconstitutional, during the heated debate over the $1.1 trillion spending bill, he only received support from 22 senators.

"The vast majority of the U.S. Senate openly disagreed with Sen. Cruz's attempt to enter opposition to President Obama's executive order on immigration, on the grounds it is unconstitutional, in the omnibus spending bill for 2015."

Sure, as my wife Irene believes, the Republicans are waiting for their majority in next year's session and then they will act!

Of course, they will!!


They must!!


I, personally, am not optimistic.


It is still The Bush Family's Republican Party and they all know Poppa Bush's New World Order dreams.

Jeb Bush is now preparing for a Presidency he feels entitled to. Jeb Bush will enter the White House to reaffirm the Bush Family's ultimate faith in Poppa Bush's New World Order run by the United Nations.

I cannot link you too often to Poppa Bush's declaration of a New World Order run by the United Nations.

This infamous video of Poppa Bush is not even "Let's sell-out America!"

"The American farm," as might be said, "has already been sold!"

With the exception of the Reagan years, America hasn't been American since President Kennedy's assassination.

Since then, the Johnson Democrats and their lame efforts against Communism and Communism's "Cover", the United Nations, the American Leftists have magically and not so mysteriously melted into the Bush Republican Party via the Nixon/Kissinger and now The Bush Family Manifesto: The Assembly of a New World Order.

"A comprehensive geopolitical strategy" is what the not-so-good Doctor Kissinger prescribes.

Only Kissinger fully understands what he means by that but I am catching on.

His article, in its typically patronizing tones toward an American audience, asks these questions: "To play a responsible role in the evolution of a 21st-century world order, the U.S. must be prepared to answer a number of questions for itself: What do we seek to prevent, no matter how it happens, and if necessary alone? What do we seek to achieve, even if not supported by any multilateral effort? What do we seek to achieve, or prevent, only if supported by an alliance? What should we not engage in, even if urged on by a multilateral group or an alliance? What is the nature of the values that we seek to advance? And how much does the application of these values depend on circumstance?"

Daddy's come home to make us think clearly, right?

The Nixon/Kissinger answers are all contained in the results of their Paris Peace Accords. An infamous set of agreements which the Communists of North Vietnam treated like an invitation to total victory, to the complete domination of Vietnam.

Major question one: "What do we seek to prevent, no matter how it happens?"

For Nixon and Kissinger, it certainly wasn't the fall of South Vietnam to Communism.

What was it then?

"We seek to prevent


 that might cripple

 Nixon's reelection."

Anything it takes.

That then was the heart of Kissinger's "realpolitik".

However, Nixon and Kissinger sold their Peace Accords as if a peaceful North and South Vietnam were the objective.

It wasn't.

Now Kissinger says that this is what he wants with a New World Order: "A world order of states affirming individual dignity and participatory governance, and cooperating internationally in accordance with agreed-upon rules, can be our hope and should be our inspiration. But progress toward it will need to be sustained through a series of intermediary stages."

Certainly sounds good.

He gets even better with his warnings in a previous paragraph: "The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another. These goals are not necessarily self-reconciling: The triumph of a radical movement might bring order to one region while setting the stage for turmoil in and with all others. The domination of a region by one country militarily, even if it brings the appearance of order, could produce a crisis for the rest of the world."

His outline of a hopeful humanity in the 1948, post-World War II state of things sounds realistic but its inference – at least judging by the American foreign policies of today – is that some major surrendering by "The West", to what I would describe as diabolically antithetical forces, must be offered up.

Or, in the case of Vietnam, the games of "realpolitik" must be played "realistically": knowing full well that the South Vietnamese, by themselves, cannot possibly defend their land against the Sino-North Vietnamese Alliance.

The deviously veiled "surrender" contained in the Paris Peace Accords depended upon the peace only lasting as long as it would take for Richard Nixon to be reelected.

It is certain, given the "reality" of the Nixon/Kissinger "realpolitik", that both Humpty and Dumpty knew they were lying to an American people, human beings "stupid enough", as Jonathan Gruber would have put it, and naïve enough to believe their leaders.

Therefore "realpolitik" has always been "Gruberpolitik".

Pap to feed "stupid Amerika"!

The American majority hardly went to Harvard or taught there, as Kissinger did, or were even consulted for their real opinion.

They are "stupid Amerika!" A herd of animals to be led by some sacredly and mysteriously appointed Progressively New World Order "genius".

The following paragraph is Kissinger at his most cunning: "The search for world order has long been defined almost exclusively by the concepts of Western societies. In the decades following World War II, the U.S.—strengthened in its economy and national confidence—began to take up the torch of international leadership and added a new dimension. A nation founded explicitly on an idea of free and representative governance, the U.S. identified its own rise with the spread of liberty and democracy and credited these forces with an ability to achieve just and lasting peace. The traditional European approach to order had viewed peoples and states as inherently competitive…"

Now comes The Truth of Real Politik, as versus what Kissinger privately believes are the romantic delusions of The American Dream.

"…to constrain the effects of their clashing ambitions, it relied on a balance of power and a concert of enlightened statesmen."

Kissinger-like statesmen.

"The prevalent American view considered people inherently reasonable and inclined toward peaceful compromise and common sense…"

A presumption which, I believe, Dr. Kissinger has, does and always will consider a delusion.

The "non-enlightened" masses, unlike much of their Kissinger/Obama-like leadership, do want what America has provided. If they didn't there wouldn't be such a mass surge of immigration, legal and otherwise, into America since her creation.

"…the spread of democracy was therefore the overarching goal for international order. Free markets would uplift individuals, enrich societies and substitute economic interdependence for traditional international rivalries."

That description is solely in the minds of Americans but not within Kissinger's "realpolitik".

Kissinger can, indeed and most eloquently, describe America's true intent, even though he quietly and diplomatically looked down upon it, labeling secretly as the childlike fantasies and optimism of a nation that refuses to grow-up and face, guess what?


Do you realize the depth of Kissinger's patronizing attitude toward American "idealism"?

And, need I remind you, that "idealism" as the heart of America's Declaration of Independence, her Constitution and her Bill of rights!

The "enlightened statesman", however, of that "traditional European approach" was, is and always shall be a select herd of Henry Kissinger's.

Why Henry Kissinger?!

His European-style "balance of power" was brought into "idealistic America" because, according to Nixon, it had to be!

According to Kissinger, there is only one way to deal with America's increasingly lonely defense of the Free World and that was to ignore America's idealism.

A Judeo-Christian "idealism" that will, if necessary, take that nation to war if necessary.

On the other hand, both Kissinger and one of the major architects of Obamacare, Jonathon Gruber, consider such idealism the very heart of American "Stupidity"!


Because idealism, to put it more bluntly than the cunning Kissinger would ever attempt to, is worse than "stupid". Idealism is, to Kissinger and Gruber, the heart of American stupidity and mankind's suicide.

Everyone involved in the Paris Peace Treaty, both sides, knew the following:

  1. Kissinger was in Paris to insure Richard Nixon's reelection; and therein lies the most practical meaning of "realpolitik".

  2. North Vietnam was there to accept a small delay of victory in order to be assured that little or no resistance would meet the Communist re-invasion of South Vietnam.

Let's compare the Nixon/Kissinger presidency with the very American "idealism" of President Dwight D. Eisenhower's handling of the Korean War.

There is still a Free South Korea, isn't there?

Vietnam, however, has, perhaps forever, left the Free World.

Both Kissinger and Nixon knew that would occur and eventually helped it happen.



When they did wage war, they waged it badly.


Neither either understood nor believed in the American Dream nor Judeo-Christian "Idealism".

They only believed in what Kissinger has described as "the most erotic thing in the world": Power!

No sincere faith or belief in the evolutionary triumph of Democracy.

And when Nixon/Kissinger needed to be reelected, they surrendered to North Vietnam like the very cunning, Power-Brokering snakes they had and have always been.

The "rabbit" which Kissinger is now holding out before the racing greyhounds of a disastrously corrupted world?

A Progressive New World Order

 run by

the United Nations.

In short,

 "Death to American Idealism!


And the likes of Kissinger and Gruber

triumph!!" ESR

Michael Moriarty is a Golden Globe and Emmy Award-winning actor who starred in the landmark television series Law and Order from 1990 to 1994. His recent film and TV credits include The Yellow Wallpaper, 12 Hours to Live, Santa Baby and Deadly Skies. Contact Michael at rainbowfamily2008@yahoo.com. He can be found on Twitter at https://twitter.com/@MGMoriarty.






Site Map

E-mail ESR



© 1996-2024, Enter Stage Right and/or its creators. All rights reserved.