Leftist sharks finally circling around Sheriff Arpaio
By Rachel Alexander
When progressives can't beat Republicans square and fair at the ballot box, they resort to dishonest Alinskyite tactics, such as character assassination and abusing the left-wing dominated legal system. They've been after America's popular Sheriff Joe Arpaio for years and are finally circling the wagons. A local progressive writer for The Arizona Republic gleefully titled his column about the sheriff's downfall earlier this month, "Would Sheriff Arpaio Look Pretty in Pink (Underwear)?"
Long known for his no-frills jails (pink underwear so gang members wouldn't steal them), chain gangs and inexpensive meals (green bologna and water), Arpaio finally really infuriated the left when he started cracking down on illegal immigration in 2005. Arizona's illegal immigration levels had reached epidemic levels, straining tax dollars. Working with conservative Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas, the pair made a significant dent in the state's illegal immigration. They lobbied to get four ballot initiatives against illegal immigration made into law in 2006. When left-leaning judges refused to enforce the new laws, the two fought back.
A flurry of investigations and legal actions began shortly afterwards. This is where the tide started turning against Arpaio, because the left controls much of the judiciary. It started with chipping away at the low-hanging fruit around Arpaio, lower-level employees who had no money, power or connections to defend themselves. The judges made findings against Arpaio, and the complicit state bar disbarred Thomas and another prosecutor (disclaimer: I was also targeted by the state bar as a low-level attorney for Arpaio at the time).
The Obama Justice Department began an investigation into Arpaio's agency in 2008, nitpicking every policy and procedure in order to cast blame. It wasn't hard to do, considering if you look hard enough, you can find a crime anywhere. Defense attorney Harvey Silverglate finds fishing expeditions such a prevalent problem now, he wrote a book entitled, "Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent." In 2011, the DOJ declared that it had found racial discrimination against Hispanics by Arpaio's law enforcement agency. This was peculiar considering 23 percent of the employees are Hispanic. The Department of Homeland Security revoked Arpaio's authority to identify and detain illegal immigrants in 2011. In March 2012, Arpaio announced that Obama's birth certificate was a forgery, and coincidentally two months later, the DOJ filed a lawsuit against him over racial profiling, U.S. v. Maricopa County.
In 2010, Pima County Superior Court judge John Leonardo ruled that Arpaio had "misused the power of his office to target" elected county officials who Arpaio believed were complicit with the judges. In what many think is no coincidence, shortly afterwards Leonardo received a plum appointment, becoming U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona, one of the largest U.S. Attorney's Offices in the country. A former high-level attorney there told me recently that the office regularly receives orders from the Obama administration to target its enemies, which employees are forced to carry out.
In 2007, a Mexican tourist filed a lawsuit against Arpaio alleging racial profiling, Melendres v. Arpaio. The plaintiff found powerful allies with deep pockets to assist him, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund. Since illegal immigrants are more likely to have traffic violations, due to being not as familiar with our laws, or to have a taillight out or similar, due to less financial resources, it is easily explainable why a larger proportion of them are pulled over.
A police officer for another law enforcement agency in Arizona told me recently that his agency is so terrified of what is happening to Arpaio that all officers have been ordered not to arrest illegal immigrants anymore unless they have a warrant out for their arrest involving a serious felony. They also have completely stopped looking for telltale signs by drivers, in place of it they indiscriminately run every single license plate they see around them. Instead of being efficient and looking for the worst offenders in society, they waste time running the plates of many who are unlikely to have any infractions.
U.S. District Court Judge G. Murray Snow has repeatedly ruled against Arpaio in the Melendres case. In 2013, he held that Arpaio's office had discriminated against Hispanics by targeting them in traffic stops. Arpaio believes there is something fishy about Snow's rulings against him, and at one point started investigating his ties to the DOJ.
In what many believe was retaliation, county officials conducted an investigation of Arpaio's office in 2011, aided by The Arizona Republic's public records requests. They concluded that he had misspent funds. Several of Arpaio's underlings were targeted in the investigation, leaving Arpaio no option but to fire his longtime Chief Deputy and Deputy Chief.
With the tide turning against Arpaio, it has been easy for the DOJ and judiciary to dismantle Arizona's SB1070, the comprehensive bill against illegal immigration that passed in 2010 with Arpaio's support. By 2012, most of the law had been gutted by judges.
Under attack from so many angles, with his former top circle of advisers and attorneys all taken out, Arpaio finally seems to be losing his ability to fight back. He has agreed to apologize for racial profiling, donate to an Hispanic civil rights group and admit that he committed civil contempt of court for not complying with a racial profiling order in the Melendres case. That still isn't enough for Judge Snow, who indicated this month that he wants Arpaio to pay personally out of his own pocket.
While Arizona is a red state, and most of its elected officials are Republicans, the judiciary, state bar and mainstream media are all controlled by the left, and even some elected Republicans are afraid to stand up to them. Anyone who aligns themselves with Arpaio becomes a target – until Arpaio is finally taken out. Arpaio is a media celebrity, but at 82 years old, he has not kept up with the vicious opposition on the Internet.
This should serve as a warning to anyone on the right who thinks popular and powerful conservatives can withstand attacks from the left. Sheriff Arpaio has been the most popular sheriff in the country for years. If the Alinskyites can take him down, they can take down anyone.