CAIR says suppress terrorists' Islamic connections and other new Islamic demands
By Sher Zieve
Although CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) has continued to be correctly linked to Islamic terrorist groups, including Hamas and Hezbollah, it actually issued a statement last Tuesday that the FBI's arrests of six jihadists in New Jersey was acceptable. Gee, thanks guys! The six arrested men—three of whom are said to be illegal immigrants and to have entered the US via its southern border—are described as "foreign born Muslims" who had plotted the mass slaughter of US soldiers stationed at Fort Dix, NJ. An audio recording of suspect Mohamad Ibrahim Shnewer revealed his comments: "If you want to do anything here, there is Fort Dix and I don't want to exaggerate, and I assure you that you can hit an American base very easily." Although CAIR has filed a lawsuit against US Airways' passengers who had the audacity to report suspicious behaviors of six Flying Imams, it has apparently decided to distance itself from these most current six terrorists. However—as is the case with CAIR—there is a caveat.
Referencing the suspects involved in the Fort Dix plot, CAIR issued the statement: "Based on the information gathered in this case, it seems clear that a potentially deadly attack has been averted. We applaud the FBI for its efforts and repeat the American Muslim community's condemnation and repudiation of all those who would plan or carry out acts of terror while falsely claiming their actions have religious justification." It then, in direct contradiction to its lawsuit against the airline passengers, continued with: "We continue to urge American Muslims to be vigilant in reporting any suspected criminal activities that could harm the safety and security of our nation." Hmmm. Is this another CAIR officials' ploy of "listen to what we say but, pay no attention to what we actually do?" Or, is it only the Muslim "community" that is allowed to turn in potential terrorists? As Muslims consider Christians and Jews to be infidels, are they not included in the ‘reporting hierarchy'?
But, I digress. The caveat to CAIR's statements is an ‘advisory' to the press. CAIR told the media to "refrain from linking this case to the faith of Islam." However, per the instructions of the Quran, that cannot be done as Islam and Muslimism are irretrievably connected to and with one another. Apparently, the mainstream media are listening, as there are few television media outlets paying much attention to this uncovered terrorist plot on US soil. Some of those that are have reduced the six Muslim terrorists to ‘incompetent'. Note: Oddly and to the jeopardy of we-the-people, this is the usual response of old leftist media to any and all thwarted Islamic plots. Little to no credit is given to those stopping said scheme before it can be implemented and the instigators are referred to as ‘bungling boobs'. Is this yet another way in which the mainstream media attempt to steer us away from real threats to both our country and our personal survival? Or, is it simply that old media lives in fear of everything and is attempting to create an alternate and false reality? Doesn't the media response seem eerily similar to the deceptive policies applied by CAIR and other terrorist and terrorist-supporting groups that advise ‘tell them what they want to hear and then continue with our plans to overthrow and destroy them'? It appears so. And, with our media's apparent willing assistance, they will continue their ruse.
As well as the Islamists in our midst now demanding that all of our soldiers—within the US—must die, Muslims in New York have issued their own demand that taxpayers fund their Arabic schools. No other religion in the USA is allowed this special and discriminatory treatment. Note: They have already won concessions for Muslim prayer rooms and foot-washing basins (also taxpayer funded) in Minnesota schools and airports, as well as Kansas City International Airport and others.
The "Kahlil Gibran International Academy" Arabic language and cultural school in New York City is scheduled to open in September 2007. Interestingly, the poet Gibran was a Lebanese Christian. This ‘public school' that has all of the earmarks of a Muslim separatist school is funded by US taxpayers. But, then, Muslims—via their Quran—are required to remain separate from other "infidel" religions and peoples. If this is the case, one might reasonably ask: "Why did they come here in the first place?" The answer is as obvious as it is logical. To change our way of life (as is being affected in European countries) to Muslims-only—with all others required to use separate and inferior facilities. That is, if they are allowed to live at all.
Islam is now being allowed to bypass the US Supreme Court's ruling regarding the separation of church and state. Apparently, said ruling does not apply to mosque and state. Each and every day, Muslims and Islamists in the USA are becoming bolder and making more demands. And, no matter how discriminatory these demands are, they are being met by our politically-correct appeasers—to the detriment of the rest us. However, there will be no need for the Muslim riots experienced in France, Belgium, Germany and other European countries. As our "leaders" are already giving the USA up to the Islamists, without either a battle or a whimper, Shari'a law and 5 times per day calls to prayer are in our not-too-distant future. The signs are all around us and we ignore them at our own mortal risks.